ext_213086 (
b-a-t.livejournal.com
) wrote
in
b_a_t
2005-08-17 02:18 am (UTC)
no subject
Hi Nadia :)
I have no doubt, that there is a plural form from 'people', just usage of it in the context of named web-site quite questionable. I'd say it is rather dedicated to the different people as a bunch of individuals, rather than groups of them...
Well, I may be wrong, you know :)
(
9 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject
I have no doubt, that there is a plural form from 'people', just usage of it in the context of named web-site quite questionable. I'd say it is rather dedicated to the different people as a bunch of individuals, rather than groups of them...
Well, I may be wrong, you know :)